Hurdles to implementation
Saudi, unlike the UAE, restricts WPS to banks alone, placing heavy demands on its banking system. Following Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency’s (SAMA) demand that pressure be eased - Opens in new tab on the Kingdom’s banks, it delayed the fourth phase from July to November 2014.
A majority of companies (between 65% to 90% based on workforce size) had complied in both Saudi and UAE. For instance, in Saudi - Opens in new tab, in the first phase (over 3000 workforce), a total of 119 companies fulfilled conditions out of 184 companies, while 48 companies pledged to submit their updated data soon after the deadline and 17 had services halted by the ministry for failure to comply with the new system.
In the second phase, (over 2000 workforce) 81 companies fulfilled the ministry’s demands, 13 were penalized for failure to comply, and 17 companies resumed services after complying past the deadline.
Punitive measures in both UAE and Saudi include suspension of ministerial services and suspension of new work permits.
Challenges and Opportunities for Qatar
Though over 90% of Qatar’s workforce is foreign, its total population is much smaller than the UAE or Saudi. Foreigners account for 87% of the nearly 10 million residents in the UAE; and over a third of the nearly 30 million in Saudi. This, coupled with Qatar’s geo-advantage – its economic activities are centred around Doha and a few oil and gas townships- should enable quick implementation and wide coverage of WPS.
Qatar must also consider workers’ ability to fully benefit from the new system by improving access to banking infrastructure. Currently, there are no ATMs in areas where low-income migrants are housed. Public transportation continues to be scarce, and the workers are unwelcome in the glitzier parts of the Doha, further restricting workers’ access to their money.
While Qatar has not made the actual system public yet, the wording of the announcement indicates it will similarly be restricted to bank transfers, putting to test the preparedness of the banks.
However, reports in a local daily indicate that exchange houses are preparing to be part of the WPS network, which would ensure much deeper reach. The article highlights scope for misuse of this system too. - Opens in new tab
“…the new rule doesn’t seem to bother some illegal workers as they think their original sponsors could open salary accounts for them with financial institutions, as required by the law, and transfer their wages.
And they could return their employers the cash immediately after, said a ‘free visa’ worker. This is happening in the case of expatriates whose salaries are low and they want to show bigger salary transfers to be eligible to sponsor their families.
“Their sponsors transfer extra sums as part of their salary and that sum is returned to them.” A ‘free visa’ is a work visa for sale on which a foreign worker arrives after buying it and takes up work elsewhere illegally. In most cases, as per rule, a worker’s sponsorship is officially transferred from ‘free visa’ to a regular visa after a year. As for runaway workers, they can be paid wages by their illegal employers in cash.”
Though the WPS may prove one step in the right direction, even if perfectly implemented it remains only a partial resolution to the systematic exploitation of migrant workers. For the WPS to have an enduring impact on the condition of migrant workers, Qatar must live up to its commitments to reform.