Now take all of that, and add a good measure of Covid19-induced restrictions and entire households in the throes of cabin fever. Domestic violence has been on the rise across the world - Opens in new tab, and live-in workers particularly are at an increased risk. Every sensible advice given to stop the spread of the viral infection is counter-productive for domestic workers. Stay home, disinfect regularly, maintain social distance. When the majority of corporations announce work-from-home directives, and creches and schools close, the load for the worker at home increases exponentially. As entire families stay home to work or study online, the domestic worker is practically on call 24/7.
Every decision taken in the wider economy, by governments and businesses, will have a macro effect within the household. When jobs are lost or pay is reduced – as they already have across the region – there is a risk of that burden being passed on to workers at home.
Of the six GCC states, four have a domestic workers’ law (Qatar, UAE, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia), Bahrain includes domestic workers in a couple of provisions of the labour law. Oman does not have any labour code for the sector. The domestic workers’ laws, where they exist, are quite rudimentary, speaking in broad terms about off days and timely salaries.
More so, none of these countries has meaningfully addressed the specific vulnerability of domestic workers in their economic response to Covid19, including the financial handouts.
Governments should also recognise that there is a large community of ‘freelance’ workers. They may be workers who have escaped abusive employers and now work irregularly in multiple homes to make a living or those who have an informal understanding with their sponsor to work in other homes. This group is especially vulnerable during this period, as most have lost their jobs and are and struggling to get sustenance.
The invisibility of domestic work and isolation of domestic workers means there has to be a multi-pronged approach to ensuring their rights are not violated. This is where businesses can play a role.
Should corporations care?
Why should businesses be concerned about what happens within the private sphere of the households of their staff? It isn’t the company’s responsibility after all. Except, it could be. We don’t live in silos where our actions can be neatly contained without affecting those around us. As corporations expand into nascent democracies or countries whose legal framework doesn’t fully meet international human right standards, it is critical that their policies take cognisance of the gaps.
The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGP) clearly states that the responsibility to respect human rights requires that they “seek to prevent or mitigate adverse human rights impacts that are directly linked to their operations, products or services by their business relationships, even if they have not contributed to those impacts.” [13(b)]