In recent months, Bahraini authorities have intensified efforts to propose policies that discriminate against migrant workers while failing to take their rights into account. As the Kingdom faces infrastructural and economic challenges, including excessive traffic and a budget deficit, migrants are increasingly scapegoated in official discourse and policies.
Bill to Link Driving Licences with Residency Permits
In recent years, and especially after the country reopened after the COVID-19 shutdown, Bahrain’s traffic congestion has become a focal point of public discussion. Continuing a long-standing tradition of scapegoating migrants for societal ills, commentators and officials laid the blame for the country’s transportation crisis on migrants.
Earlier this year, a group of MPs introduced - Opens in new tab a bill to link migrant’s driving licences with their residency permits and align their expiration dates. Both Bahraini citizens and migrants are currently granted driving licences for a five-year period.
The proposed legislation garnered unanimous approval from the parliamentary body and is currently awaiting a decision in the Shura Council. The lawmakers behind the bill assert - Opens in new tab that its primary objectives are to “tackle ongoing violations by expatriates illegally residing in Bahrain” and to “reduce traffic congestion in the country with fewer licences being issued.” Furthermore, parliament members urged traffic police to effectively function as border agents and prevent irregular migrants from operating vehicles within the country.
While the Parliament’s foreign affairs, defence, and national security committee had backed the bill, the Interior Ministry urged MPs to reject it, citing concerns that it’s “inapplicable and will lead to statistical disruptions in the electronic system and confusion among traffic police implementing the rules.”
Notably, Bahrain’s National Institution for Human Rights (NIHR), with Ali Al-Derazi - Opens in new tab serving as its current president, informed MPs that the proposal did not violate any human rights since “it doesn’t restrict or prevent the movement of expats.” The NIHR added that the bill “is purely organisational and doesn’t breach the equality status, expatriates’ freedom or international human rights conventions or treaties.”
As MR previously highlighted in Kuwait, where a parallel situation is unfolding, the local discourse on traffic congestion tends to disregard two crucial facts: firstly, that its principal cause is inadequate urban and infrastructure planning based on private modes of transportation in a confined land area. And secondly, that migrant workers form the sole demographic relying on public transport, own fewer private cars than the local population, and frequently carpool. The majority of migrants in Bahrain are low-income and generally do not own personal vehicles. Of those who do use cars, a significant number do so as part of their job responsibilities and use company-provided vehicles.

