KAMPALA: In the remote Ugandan village of Mawogolla, Masaka, a ten year-old girl, collapses in grief as the coffin of her mother Flora Ritah Zawedde Nanteza, 33, is lowered into a grave. Nanteza, who moved to Dubai in 2013 in search of a better life, died in prison.
However, Nanteza was not a criminal. She had worked as a maid for a year but when she found life at her sponsor’s Dubai home had become unsustainably difficult, she decided to go out on her own and look for a job elsewhere. The sponsor lodged a complaint and she was registered as a runway, thus becoming wanted by authorities. She was found and arrested on July 17, 2015, and two weeks later she suffered a heart attack arising from high blood pressure. She was hospitalized and put on life support. Three days later, on August 2, she was dead

After her death, Ugandan workers in Dubai began the all-too-familiar fundraising ritual in order to cover the expenses of repatriating the body to Uganda. Nanteza’s remains were returned home two weeks later.
It is convenient to treat Nanteza’s death as a routine incident due to underlying health problems, but critical questions remain: Why should hard-working migrant workers looking to make a better life for themselves and their families face the constant threat of imprisonment and deportation?
In Dubai and throughout the United Arab Emirates, the restrictive sponsorship system – Kafala – gives employers disproportionate power that allows them to keep their workers in bondage and indentured servitude. For workers like Nanteza, they must seek their employer’s permission to quit or change jobs and in countries like Qatar and Saudi Arabia, a worker needs an employer’s permission to leave the country (exit permits). While the UAE does not have an exit permit policy, workers still find it difficult to leave the country, especially when they are involved in disputes about their working conditions, as most employers immediately confiscate their workers’ passports when they are hired. Domestic workers including housemaids have also reported that their employers restrict their access to mobile phones and the Internet, often the only means many low-income migrant workers have to stay in contact with families in their homelands.
Foreign employees have no guarantees in laws that purport to protect them from abusive supervisors. Gulf governments say they cannot logistically monitor working conditions, especially for domestic workers in private home settings. The governments pay little to no attention to issues of domestic workers coming from struggling or developing countries. In order for any legislative reform of the Kafala to take hold would require a wholesale change in employer’s attitudes and behaviors.


